1. 31 Jan, 2019 2 commits
    • James Lopez's avatar
      c653921b
    • Jan Provaznik's avatar
      Sent notification only to authorized users · 4d7fa59a
      Jan Provaznik authored
      When moving a project, it's possible that some users who had
      access to the project in old path can not access the project
      in the new path.
      
      Because `project_authorizations` records are updated asynchronously,
      when we send the notification about moved project the list of project
      team members contains old project members, we want to notify all these
      members except the old users who can not access the new location.
      4d7fa59a
  2. 25 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  3. 24 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  4. 23 Jan, 2019 1 commit
    • Jan Provaznik's avatar
      Sent notification only to authorized users · 022f60e8
      Jan Provaznik authored
      When moving a project, it's possible that some users who had
      access to the project in old path can not access the project
      in the new path.
      
      Because `project_authorizations` records are updated asynchronously,
      when we send the notification about moved project the list of project
      team members contains old project members, we want to notify all these
      members except the old users who can not access the new location.
      022f60e8
  5. 06 Dec, 2018 1 commit
  6. 15 Nov, 2018 1 commit
    • Yorick Peterse's avatar
      Refactor Member#add_user for GitLab EE · 0aa386f7
      Yorick Peterse authored
      GitLab EE extends Member#add_user by adding some LDAP specific flags.
      Prior to these changes, the only way this could be done was by modifying
      Member#add_user in place. This could lead to merge conflicts whenever a
      developer wants to change this method.
      
      To resolve this issue, the logic that EE extends has been moved into a
      separate method with the appropriate arguments. This allows EE to extend
      the logic by prepending the method using an EE specific module.
      0aa386f7
  7. 11 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  8. 21 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  9. 27 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  10. 11 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  11. 10 May, 2018 1 commit
  12. 04 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  13. 21 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  14. 11 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  15. 08 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  16. 27 Feb, 2018 2 commits
  17. 14 Feb, 2018 1 commit
  18. 11 Dec, 2017 1 commit
    • TM Lee's avatar
      Refactor member view by using presenter · 2cf3fc18
      TM Lee authored
      - Create MemberPresenter alongside with GroupMemberPresenter and ProjectMemberPresenter
      - Make Member model Presentable
      - Move action_member_permission from MembersHelper into the MemberPresenter
      - Added rspec using double, separate specs for GroupMemberPresenter and ProjectMemberPresenter
      
      Fixes #28004.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
      2cf3fc18
  19. 05 Dec, 2017 1 commit
  20. 05 Sep, 2017 1 commit
    • Rubén Dávila's avatar
      Optimize SQL queries used in Groups::GroupMembersController#create · 66cfb901
      Rubén Dávila authored
      The following optimizations were performed:
      
      - Add new association to GroupMember and ProjectMember
      
        This new association will allow us to check if a user is a member of a
        Project or Group through a single query instead of two.
      
      - Optimize retrieving of Members when adding multiple Users
      66cfb901
  21. 14 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  22. 12 Aug, 2017 3 commits
  23. 21 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  24. 07 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  25. 05 Jun, 2017 1 commit
    • Sean McGivern's avatar
      Allow group reporters to manage group labels · 5db229fb
      Sean McGivern authored
      Previously, only group masters could do this. However, project reporters can
      manage project labels, so there doesn't seem to be any need to restrict group
      labels further.
      
      Also, save a query or two by getting a single GroupMember object to find out if
      the user is a master or not.
      5db229fb
  26. 28 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  27. 21 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  28. 23 Feb, 2017 5 commits
  29. 10 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  30. 25 Jan, 2017 1 commit
    • Yorick Peterse's avatar
      Fix race conditions for AuthorizedProjectsWorker · 88e627cf
      Yorick Peterse authored
      There were two cases that could be problematic:
      
      1. Because sometimes AuthorizedProjectsWorker would be scheduled in a
         transaction it was possible for a job to run/complete before a
         COMMIT; resulting in it either producing an error, or producing no
         new data.
      
      2. When scheduling jobs the code would not wait until completion. This
         could lead to a user creating a project and then immediately trying
         to push to it. Usually this will work fine, but given enough load it
         might take a few seconds before a user has access.
      
      The first one is problematic, the second one is mostly just annoying
      (but annoying enough to warrant a solution).
      
      This commit changes two things to deal with this:
      
      1. Sidekiq scheduling now takes places after a COMMIT, this is ensured
         by scheduling using Rails' after_commit hook instead of doing so in
         an arbitrary method.
      
      2. When scheduling jobs the calling thread now waits for all jobs to
         complete.
      
      Solution 2 requires tracking of job completions. Sidekiq provides a way
      to find a job by its ID, but this involves scanning over the entire
      queue; something that is very in-efficient for large queues. As such a
      more efficient solution is necessary. There are two main Gems that can
      do this in a more efficient manner:
      
      * sidekiq-status
      * sidekiq_status
      
      No, this is not a joke. Both Gems do a similar thing (but slightly
      different), and the only difference in their name is a dash vs an
      underscore. Both Gems however provide far more than just checking if a
      job has been completed, and both have their problems. sidekiq-status
      does not appear to be actively maintained, with the last release being
      in 2015. It also has some issues during testing as API calls are not
      stubbed in any way. sidekiq_status on the other hand does not appear to
      be very popular, and introduces a similar amount of code.
      
      Because of this I opted to write a simple home grown solution. After
      all, all we need is storing a job ID somewhere so we can efficiently
      look it up; we don't need extra web UIs (as provided by sidekiq-status)
      or complex APIs to update progress, etc.
      
      This is where Gitlab::SidekiqStatus comes in handy. This namespace
      contains some code used for tracking, removing, and looking up job IDs;
      all without having to scan over an entire queue. Data is removed
      explicitly, but also expires automatically just in case.
      
      Using this API we can now schedule jobs in a fork-join like manner: we
      schedule the jobs in Sidekiq, process them in parallel, then wait for
      completion. By using Sidekiq we can leverage all the benefits such as
      being able to scale across multiple cores and hosts, retrying failed
      jobs, etc.
      
      The one downside is that we need to make sure we can deal with
      unexpected increases in job processing timings. To deal with this the
      class Gitlab::JobWaiter (used for waiting for jobs to complete) will
      only wait a number of seconds (30 by default). Once this timeout is
      reached it will simply return.
      
      For GitLab.com almost all AuthorizedProjectWorker jobs complete in
      seconds, only very rarely do we spike to job timings of around a minute.
      These in turn seem to be the result of external factors (e.g. deploys),
      in which case a user is most likely not able to use the system anyway.
      
      In short, this new solution should ensure that jobs are processed
      properly and that in almost all cases a user has access to their
      resources whenever they need to have access.
      88e627cf
  31. 16 Dec, 2016 2 commits