Use the `can?` helper instead of `current_user.can?`

Fixes #15513.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRémy Coutable <>
parent d5398e96
......@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@ Please view this file on the master branch, on stable branches it's out of date.
v 8.8.0 (unreleased)
v 8.7.0 (unreleased)
v 8.7.1 (unreleased)
- Use the `can?` helper instead of `current_user.can?`
v 8.7.0
- Gitlab::GitAccess and Gitlab::GitAccessWiki are now instrumented
- Fix vulnerability that made it possible to gain access to private labels and milestones
- The number of InfluxDB points stored per UDP packet can now be configured
......@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
group, members with
%strong #{group_links.human_access}
role (#{shared_group_users_count})
- if current_user.can?(:admin_group, shared_group)
- if can?(current_user, :admin_group, shared_group)
= link_to group_group_members_path(shared_group), class: 'btn btn-sm' do
require 'spec_helper'
feature 'Projects > Members > Anonymous user sees members', feature: true do
let(:user) { create(:user) }
let(:group) { create(:group, :public) }
let(:project) { create(:empty_project, :public) }
background do << [user, :master]
create(:project_group_link, project: project, group: group)
scenario "anonymous user visits the project's members page and sees the list of members" do
visit namespace_project_project_members_path(project.namespace, project)
expect(current_path).to eq(
namespace_project_project_members_path(project.namespace, project))
expect(page).to have_content(
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment